Re: Wingfield Applications-of-Arms
The fresh new Tickencote photo generally seems to go out from no less than 1650 in respect in order to page 3of Certain Info of Wingfield Nearest and dearest from the Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished by Wingfield Members of the family Community within the 1991. ISBN0-nine37543-03-9.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld out of Letheringham, his [Sir Robert which d. ily out of half dozen otherwise eight sons and you may fivedaughters, and is also off him, along with his people and you may grandchildren,whom starred no small-part in the factors of your own world of The united kingdomt, you to thepresent functions [Wingfield’s publication] food.
His oldest young buck try Sir John Wyngfeld off Letheringham, Knight, whom, which have hiswife, mode both central figures on dated pedigree petroleum images whichprovide the main topic of these records.
There are 2 of those oictures around, nearly identically similar, oneat Tickencote Hall, Rutland, and also the most other at Boughton Family, Northants. Itis unidentified which is the completely new and you may which is the duplicate.
Which partners try encircled in the best and you will base documents because of the wife brazilian all of their 16 people, within the for each case Wingfield residence (1) Bosville and you will (2) quarterly, Goushell while the chequy coating
The only at Tickncote, today belonging to Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, is coated towards the material, and has most likely already been through it due to the fact about1650, since it is probably this ended up being the property of one’s past SirRobert Wingfield off Upton, from inside the Northamptonshire, who is said to possess diedduring the new commonwealth, and lots of of whose oils paintings was at thattime eliminated so you can his cousin’s domestic on Tickencote, whenever Upton was sold, andwhich remain around.”
The author states you to “the image within the Boughton house can easily be tracedback so you’re able to 1677” (web page cuatro) and gives a few statements on the middle 1700srefering in order to direction of the image and its own speech with the Duke ofMontague.
Mcdougal says towards the page six that “When, or because of the whose acquisition, otherwise by the which they waspainted, is still a concern unclear of the gurus.”
Again, my personal inquiries into group center perhaps not within the genealogicalconnections of the participants, (new Wingfields have been explored fairlywell, and you may despite my typo into Howard nearest and dearest, I really do feel the pedigreeaccurately annotated within RI) but on reasoning of which protects weredisplayed by the second two years. In my opinion We have a concept of what”should” be on brand new respective protects, and you will have always been thinking as to why, in this case,that will not appear to be what is actually shown. Both I’m misleading into the myunderstanding, and/or Wingfield’s had been playing fairly prompt and you can reduce withtheir hands for the majority of objective and this we possibly may not even learn.
Kelly, thanks for giving myself photos, and you may by way of Tim to possess protecting me the trouble away from getting them online. Looking which over plus the pedigrees in Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of your own Old Saxon Family of Wingfield_, the organization is now obvious in my experience; additionally, it appears that there’s one glaring heraldic mistake, right in the center, perhaps the supply of your misunderstandings. I’m able to accept We haven’t twice-featured every children’s impalings and i have one most other unanswered concern (what is the coroneted lozenge throughout the all the way down sign in?). The red-colored outlines apparently superimposed about visualize from the book commonly such as for instance of use, and also the annotated ‘key’ will not in fact reproduce the language captions and you can does not define individuals whoever hands are offered.
There are 2 interesting things to the image recommending one or two some other concentrates. First, it concentrates on a fifteenth-century relationships and you will shows the children of these matrimony, however, no later matter. Next, they reveals a security part that have ancestry down seriously to brand new 17th century.
The fresh new main committee is the relationship regarding Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) in order to Elizabeth, dau. away from Sir John Fitz Lewis and you can Anne (Montacute). Both figures kneel in the middle, and are also surmounted of the impalings of its parents’ arms inside the wreaths. The new heraldic mistake is here now, as Sir John’s father’s completion one another residence and impales Gousell (actually, Gousell quartered with this particular chequy coating). This is certainly an error. It’s visible that the quartering from Gousell and also the chequy finish is available in at that point, so it cannot be both quartered and impaled regarding the wreath (until, by the implication, Sir John just who d. 1481 had taken an enthusiastic Oedipus and you may partnered his own mommy). Anything I don’t acknowledge ‘s the coroneted lozenge hovering over the pupils from the down check in.
